Comparison

Capstan and Multiplier

Multiplier is a serious product, and this page is not a scorecard. It sets out how each of the two is built, taking each side from how it is publicly positioned, and then gives you the questions worth putting to any vendor in this market, us included. Where Multiplier is the better buy, it says so, and it says where Capstan is the wrong choice outright.

What each one is built to be

Start here rather than with a feature list. Most of the difference between two HR products is decided before either one ships a feature, by what business the company is in.

Multiplier, as publicly positioned, September 2026

Multiplier presents itself as a global employment platform, founded in Asia and built to help companies hire, onboard and pay people across borders through employer of record, contractor management and global payroll. The published shape of the offer is one platform that lets a company put people to work in many countries quickly, carrying the employment where the company has no entity of its own.

Capstan, published on this site

Capstan is an HR system of record for companies that employ their own people. It holds the roster, the employment, leave, attendance, documents and the workflows around them, with the module suite included on every plan for the rest. It is not an employer of record, it computes no payroll, and it runs as a self-contained stack in one EU region live today, data in Frankfurt and compute in Amsterdam.

Set out in full on the product page, with the residency model on security and every figure on pricing.

Three structural differences

One axis at a time, two published models, each stated as what it is. Nothing here says what Multiplier does not do: their model is theirs to describe, and if it moves, the line about ours still holds.

  1. Who holds the employment

    Multiplier, as publicly positioned, September 2026

    Employer of record is central to the published offer: where you hold no entity in a country, a legal employer is arranged there and the statutory obligations of employing someone are taken on with it.

    Capstan, published on this site

    Capstan employs nobody. It is a system of record for employment you already hold in your own entity, and it never becomes the legal employer of anyone on your roster. If you need a legal employer where you have no entity, that is a different kind of vendor.

  2. Who computes and moves payroll

    Multiplier, as publicly positioned, September 2026

    Global payroll and contractor payments across the countries it covers are services Multiplier operates, moving money to the people on its platform.

    Capstan, published on this site

    Capstan compiles payroll inputs into a documented export for your payroll partner and files the computed results back onto the employee record. It moves no money, holds no statutory rate, slab or formula anywhere, and files nothing with any authority.

  3. How the offer is shaped

    Multiplier, as publicly positioned, September 2026

    The offer is organised around cross-border hiring: employer-of-record employees, contractors and the payments that follow, built for speed of putting people to work in new countries.

    Capstan, published on this site

    One core, identical on every plan including the free one, with all fourteen modules included. The bill follows your headcount, month to month, with no annual contract and no lock-in, and every figure is on one public page.

The six questions to ask any vendor, including us

Our answers are here in public with nothing rounded off. The slot beside each one is left open on purpose: Multiplier’s answers are theirs to give, and a comparison page that fills them in has stopped being a comparison. Ask them the same six, and set what you are told beside ours.

  1. Who employs our people, and who carries the liability?

    It decides who is on the contract of employment, who answers a labour authority, and what you are actually buying: a service that takes the employment on, or a system that records it.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    You do. Capstan is not an employer of record, never becomes the legal employer of anyone on your roster, and moves no payroll money. If you need a legal employer in a country where you have no entity, that is a different kind of vendor.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

  2. Who computes payroll, and whose name is on the filing?

    Computation and filing are where liability sits. A vendor that calculates and files is taking that on. A vendor that prepares inputs is not, and you need the second half of the arrangement in place before you rely on either.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    Not Capstan, by design. It compiles joiners and leavers, pay structures, leave, attendance and adjustments into a documented export for your payroll partner, and files the computed results back onto the employee record. It holds no statutory rate, slab or formula, and files nothing with any authority.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

  3. Where does our data live, and who inside the vendor can reach it?

    Residency is a property of where the database is, not of a promise in a policy. Support access is the same question from the other end: not whether staff would look, but whether the system lets them without you switching it on.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    One isolated region, the EU today: data in Frankfurt, compute in Amsterdam. It is a self-contained stack with no global control plane and no cross-region keys, so there is no runtime path out of the region. Staff hold no tenant of their own, and access exists only while you have granted a time-boxed consent, masked by default and audited on both sides.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

  4. What do we get on the plan we start on, and what changes as we grow?

    This is what growing costs you. If capability moves between tiers, the upgrade you eventually buy is largely software you were already being shown.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    The complete core is on every plan, including the free one, which is capped at twenty active employees. Paying lifts the cap and includes all fourteen modules at no extra charge, billed month to month with no annual contract and no lock-in. Every figure is on one public page, so you can total your own number without a call.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

  5. What happens to our data the day we leave, or the day a payment fails?

    Export is the price of leaving. Either it is written down before you join, or it gets decided at the moment you have the least leverage you will ever have.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    An owner can take a full export at any time: one archive of JSON and CSV, in open formats, with a documented manifest. Export deliberately sits outside the suspension check, so a workspace held for non-payment can still be exported. Deletion is cryptographic erasure followed by hard deletion, with a residue scan.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

  6. Does any software judge our people, and can the person see why?

    Whether software scores, ranks or screens people decides who is accountable for the judgement, and whether the person it was made about can be shown the reason.

    Capstan’s answer, in public

    No AI scores, ranks or screens your people, and that is architectural rather than a promise: nothing of the kind is built, and the analytics engine can only ever narrow who sees what, with small groups suppressed. There is one optional assistant a workspace can turn on. When it is on, it answers from aggregate figures a caller could already see, such as headcount by department, which it sends to our one AI sub-processor, OpenAI, listed on the sub-processor register and not used to train on the data. No per-person or sensitive record is ever sent to an outside model or used to train one.

    Multiplier’s answer

    Ask them, and get it in writing.

If an answer of ours turns out to be wrong, it is a bug and we will fix the page. The same standard applies to anything here about Multiplier: tell us and we correct it or take it down.

Choose Multiplier if

This is the part of the page that makes the rest of it worth reading. If one of these describes you, the honest answer is that Multiplier is the better buy, and we would rather you knew it here than three months into an implementation.

  • You want to put people to work across borders quickly, in countries where you hold no entity, and you would rather one company became the legal employer there than set up entities yourself. Capstan does not offer an employer of record at any price or on any plan.
  • Cross-border contractor payments and global payroll are the problem this quarter, and you want one vendor moving the money and carrying the compliance.
  • Speed of hiring in a new market matters more to you than holding a portable system of record in your own entity, and that trade is the right one for where you are.

The part that costs us the sale

Where Capstan is the wrong choice

Not a softened version of the section above. These are requirements Capstan does not meet and is not going to meet, written down so you can rule us out in a minute rather than in a quarter. If one of them is true of you, nothing else on this page matters.

  1. You need a legal employer somewhere you have no entity. Capstan is not an employer of record and will not become one.

  2. You want one vendor to employ the people, run the payroll and move the money across borders. Capstan does none of those three.

  3. Most of your people are engaged through an employer of record or paid as contractors by the platform itself. Capstan records people you employ in your own entity, so much of what you are buying would sit outside it.

That is the list as we understand it today. If you hit a limit that is not on it, tell us: a disqualifier we did not know about belongs here more than anything else on the page.

If nothing on this page ruled us out, run it yourself.